I’ve never been one to keep my opinion to myself. Therefore, I would be remiss if I didn’t say I was disappointed in Saturday’s election of Dan Claitor to the Louisiana Senate District 16 seat. It was no secret that I thought Lee Domingue was the best candidate for the job.
There are so many great lessons to learn from life, and the Senate District 16 race is no exception:
- Don’t make any donations to political campaigns, or for the betterment of Louisiana: (Domingue donated to Jindal’s campaign and ‘Believe in Louisiana’.) If you plan to run for office, just don’t contribute any money towards the good of Louisiana, else it will be used against you.
- Don’t give endorsements in a political campaign: If you do endorse a candidate, be prepared to receiving scathing attacks from reporters and bloggers, as they will assume you have an agenda like they do. (Both Governor Bobby Jindal and BR Business Report Publisher Rolfe McCollister experienced this scenario because they endorsed Domingue.)
- Don’t do business with any rich families in the Red Stick: If you do, and dare cross the rich and powerful, (Paula Pennington de la Bretonne, et al) you will find your personal story on the front page of the local newspaper for everyone in the Red Stick to read.
- The Advocate’s original code of ethics has been defiled: The Advocate has a creed, as set forth by Charles Manship, to create a newspaper with high standards of ethical behavior. Journalists, like Marsha Shuler, have defiled ethics by reporting news based on her personal beliefs in a biased manner. The Advocate is not a blog or forum for personal agendas, and news stories are a vast difference from the Opinion page of a newspaper.
- Pundits will change their tune after you are elected: Jindal was the most beloved candidate for Governor by all the political pundits and journalists while a candidate. These same pundits, once the money train stopped, crossed to the other side in a media frenzy to attack Jindal. No doubt, Claitor, will enjoy this privilege in due time from these same pundits.
- Negative campaigning is still beloved in the Red Stick: The pundit’s negative spin is more important than the positive issues that may affect voters in any given district. This was proven by the fact that sensationalism reporting and character assassination was given precedence over critical issues that affect Senate District 16.
- Hide any facts about yourself if you are a candidate, but expose your opponent’s full history: This includes your personal wealth, your background and work history, and business dealings. (Domingue’s personal life history was used against him, even though he laid his life open on his website and in a book he authored. But Claitor’s personal financial history and work history was hidden from public view.)
Dan Claitor worked very deceptively behind the scenes to win this senate seat. He also lied on the radio claiming I was working for the Domingue campaign. I do not know either candidate and did not and will not receive any monies directly or indirectly from any candidate or their representatives in this race. That’s more than I can say for other political websites. Claitor has made it obvious he is a character assassin. No doubt he will continue this character trait for years to come. We are, after all, creatures of habit.
Perhaps congratulations are in order to the voters for electing the to District 16? You have just elected a liar, and a man that worked the system like old-line politicians who, for years, have used others to do their dirty work. I suppose that is the greatest lesson of all – and the saddest one: that the legacy of Edwin W. Edwards is still alive and well and flowing through the veins of the very pundits that claim they want change for our state.
Until next time,
Red Stick Republican