Political consultant, Roy Fletcher, said, “In politics, when you have to make a case that is not believed by the people, you better have a lot of money to make that case, because they don’t believe it in the first place.”
Fletcher was referring to Mayor Kip Holden’s bond issue, and the fact that the people didn’t believe in it enough to pass it last fall.
Obviously money will continue to be spent on a public relations campaign targeting voters in hopes they will buy into accepting higher taxes. Where does this money come from, and how can we find out how much is being spent?
George Kennedy, another consultant, tries to make the argument that the bond proposal pays for itself. This is almost laughable. If it paid for itself and was ‘free’ as Kennedy claims, we wouldn’t need a tax. Maybe Holden should hire Kennedy to sell this wacko political spin?
Who are the Redstick’s watchdogs?
Not our newspaper. The Advocate questions Jindal, but not Holden on transparency issues because they have an axe to grind with Jindal. Everyone knows McCollister, publisher of the Baton Rouge Business Report, served as a finance chair to Jindal. Cutting into The Advocate’s market share just adds insult to injury.
The owners of the newspaper have made it clear that if Alive! happens, they will be pleased because it would raise the property value of their former headquarters downtown. With newspaper sales down, they probably need to sell the building.
BRAC, the Baton Rouge Area Chamber, and BRAF, the Baton Rouge Area Foundation, are not our watchdogs either. BRAC and BRAF work hand-in-hand and BRAC receives $500,000 annually from Mayor Kip Holden to be the economic development arm for the parish. They are part of Holden’s entourage.
The same goes for the Downtown Development District. The DDD receives far too much funding and support from Mayor-President Kip Holden to speak out against his administration. In fact, he and Davis Rhorer, executive director, are close allies. Besides, they have far too much invested in this tax package.
Sometimes it is up to us, the voters, to be the watchdogs.
We, the voters, have already spoken once on this issue, and our answer was no! 72% of East Baton Rouge Parish voters turned out last fall and voted against a tax increase. Instead of taking voters at face value, they say that Holden and his entourage have decided to bank on lower turnout to pass the proposal.
Perhaps the coffee shop talk is accurate? If they know their facts, then funding for the public relations campaign such as Progress Is comes from Holden’s entourage and his political contributors.
Whether they are correct or not, city-parish government has NO business spending OUR tax dollars building a tourist attraction. Who came up with this idea?
Some say the financing of Audubon Alive! makes building a prison more palatable to the average voter. One thing is for sure, the economic impact figures are highly inflated. No big surprise, they usually are.
If Alive! is such a great potential moneymaker, let the Audubon Institute raise private funds and add it to their array of facilities.
By the way, have you checked their financial records lately?
All of the Audubon Institute facilities combined brought in $10.3 million last year in admissions with only three facilities operated in the black: the Zoo, the Insectarium, and the Park. All of these facilities lost money: IMAX, Aquarium, Wolberg, Research Center, and Survival Centers.
That includes an annual tax millage totaling $7.2 million. It’s always good to do your homework. Trust me, Holden’s public relations package won’t be sharing this kind of information with taxpayers!
Until next time,
Red Stick Republican